Moving
Will Pete Hegseth be impeached? Before Jan 1, 2027 4.5% ▼−82Pete Hegseth impeached by...? December 31, 2026 3.1% ▼−78Which Representatives will vote to impeach Pete He… Thomas Massie 14% ▼−74How many House Republicans will vote to impeach Pe… At least 1 9.5% ▼−71Top 5 most searched people on Google in 2026 Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva 86% ▲+64Will Iran target Oman by...? November 30 73% ▲+59CPI in November Above -0.2% 92% ▲+55Who will be the next Speaker of the Knesset? Matan Kahana 93% ▲+55Haiti vs USA Haiti 11% ▼−48Nugroho vs Tsao Chia Yi Tsao 61% ▲+46Miami vs Utah: 4th Quarter Winner Utah 80% ▲+46Loyola Marymount Lions vs. Troy Trojans O/U 145.5 10% ▼−43Western Michigan vs. Akron Western Michigan vs. Akron: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 91% ▲+41Fed decisions (Oct-Jan) Pause-Hike-Hike 44% ▲+38
KalshiCloses January 7, 2027

When will P vs NP be resolved?

Before 2040 leads at 45% (about 4 in ten) on Kalshi, as of Nov 11, 04:18 UTC. It's up 4 points in the last 24 hours.

Before 2040 45% ▲ 4 pts · 24h

The odds

as of Nov 11, 04:18 UTC
  • Before 2040 45% +4
  • Before 2035 35% —
  • Before 2030 21% −1
  • Before 2029 10% −8
  • Before 2028 6% —
  • Before 2027 3% −3

Each outcome here is its own yes/no question, so the chances don't add up to 100%.

Traded today$5K
Traded in all$25K
Favourite, 7 days−2.5 pts

Before 2040, the last 7 days

Kalshi price
25%50%75%Nov 3Nov 1145%

Nov 4: 49% · Nov 5: 49% · Nov 6: 44% · Nov 7: 44% · Nov 8: 46% · Nov 9: 44% · Nov 10: 47% · Nov 11: 45%

How it resolves

Kalshi's rule, word for word
(Each outcome is its own contract. This is the rule for the favourite, Before 2040; the others read the same way with their own outcome.) If P versus NP Problem in its official Clay Mathematics Institute formulation is resolved before Jan 1, 2040 under the Payout Criterion and that resolution has not been retracted, withdrawn, repudiated, or rescinded prior to the Expiration time, then the market resolves to Yes. For purposes of this Contract, P versus NP Problem in its official Clay Mathematics Institute formulation is considered resolved if at least one of the following occurs and has not been retracted, withdrawn, repudiated, or rescinded prior to the Expiration time: A peer-reviewed article presenting a complete proof, a complete disproof, or a counterexample establishing the falsity of the conjecture, in the conjecture's original form as specified by the Exchange at Issuance, has been published in one or more Source Agency peer-reviewed journals. A recognized authoritative body for the academic field of the conjecture, including but not limited to Annals of Mathematics, the American Mathematical Society, the International Mathematical Union, a national academy of sciences, the Nobel Foundation, or an equivalent governing or recognition body for the relevant academic field, has officially recognized in a written communication that the conjecture, in its original form as specified by the Exchange at Issuance, has been resolved by reference to a specific written work. At least two Source Agencies have published reporting describing the conjecture, in its original form as specified by the Exchange at Issuance, as having been proven, disproven, or otherwise resolved by reference to a specific publicly available written work, and no Source Agency has, prior to the Expiration time, published reporting that such written work has been formally retracted by its author(s) or by any publishing journal, has been formally withdrawn or repudiated by its author(s), or contains an identified error that has not been publicly corrected or addressed by the author(s) in a subsequent publication or amendment.

Settlement sources: The Washington Post; The Economist; Science; the Clay Mathematics Institute; the New York Times; Bloomberg News; The Wall Street Journal; the American Mathematical Society; the International Mathematical Union; The Guardian; the Associated Press; Reuters; Scientific American

See it on Kalshi ↗

Tech & science

More markets like this

All →