Moving
Raman's LA margin vs. Talarico's Texas margin? Talarico by 5-10 5% ▼−85Nottingham Forest vs Manchester City Nottingham Forest 94% ▲+73Nottingham Forest FC vs. Manchester City FC Nottingham Forest FC 93% ▲+72Leganes vs Albacete Albacete 96% ▲+69Kansas City vs Angel City FC Tie 90% ▲+69CD Leganés vs. Albacete Balompié Albacete Balompié 95% ▲+69Morehead St. vs Marist Morehead St. 76% ▲+61University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment - Novemb… 49.0 to 51.9 75% ▲+52CA Gimnasia y Esgrima de Mendoza vs. CS Independie… CA Gimnasia y Esgrima de Mendoza 81% ▲+52Mendoza vs Rivadavia Mendoza 80% ▲+51Robert Morris vs Duquesne Duquesne 30% ▼−50Riga FC vs. FC RFS Draw (Riga FC vs. FC RFS) 96% ▲+48Artnak vs Bigun Bor Artnak 96% ▲+46Osasuna vs Bilbao Tie 70% ▲+43
KalshiCloses November 3, 2027

Which Senate races will be within 1 point?

Alaska leads at 8% (a long shot, about one in 13) on Kalshi, as of Nov 7, 19:13 UTC. It's down 1 points in the last 24 hours.

Alaska 8% ▼ 1 pts · 24h

The odds

as of Nov 7, 19:13 UTC
  • Alaska 8% −1
  • Iowa 3% —
  • Ohio (special) 3% −7
  • Nebraska 2% —
  • Maine 1.5% —
  • Kansas 1.5% —
  • Michigan 1.5% —
  • Texas 1% —

Each outcome here is its own yes/no question, so the chances don't add up to 100%.

Traded today$762
Traded in all$25K
Favourite, 7 days−6.5 pts

Alaska, the last 7 days

Kalshi price
25%50%75%Oct 30Nov 78%

Oct 31: 14% · Nov 1: 14% · Nov 2: 12% · Nov 3: 10% · Nov 4: 9% · Nov 5: 86% · Nov 6: 2% · Nov 7: 8%

How it resolves

Kalshi's rule, word for word
(Each outcome is its own contract. This is the rule for the favourite, Alaska; the others read the same way with their own outcome.) If the margin of victory for the election winner in the 2026 U.S. Senate general election in Alaska falls within 0 to 1 percentage points, inclusive of both endpoints, then the market resolves to Yes. The margin is the difference between the winner's vote share and the second-place finisher's vote share, measured in percentage points. Zero indicates a tie. Certified official results are used, subject to the contract's Fully-Conducted Elections and accelerated-resolution provisions. For ranked-choice voting, the vote shares in the last round actually conducted are used.

Settlement sources: Texas Secretary of State, Elections Division; Alaska Division of Elections; Maine Secretary of State, Division of Elections; Iowa Secretary of State, Elections Division; South Carolina Election Commission; Kansas Secretary of State, Elections Division; Nebraska Secretary of State; Michigan Department of State; Ohio Secretary of State; Florida Department of State; New Hampshire Secretary of State; North Carolina State Board of Elections

See it on Kalshi ↗

Politics & elections

More markets like this

All →